Thursday, January 19, 2006

Human Rights Watch Issues 2006 Annual Report

Human Rights Watch issued its 2006 annual report yesterday. The press release focused on the United States "conscious policy choice by senior U.S. government officials" to engage in abusive inerrogation. That policy has "hampered Washington’s ability to cajole or pressure other states into respecting international law." “Responsibility for the use of torture and mistreatment can no longer credibly be passed off to misadventures by low-ranking soldiers on the nightshift,” said Roth. “The Bush administration must appoint a special prosecutor to examine these abuses, and Congress should set up an independent, bipartisan panel to investigate.” The press release also sharply criticized Canada, Britain and the rest of the EU for "subordinat[ing] human rights in its relationship with others deemed useful in fighting terrorism."
Kenneth Roth's introduction is even more vitriolic in its criticism, stating that, "The U.S. government’s use and defense of torture and inhumane treatment played the largest role in undermining Washington’s ability to promote human rights. In the course of 2005, it became indisputable that U.S. mistreatment of detainees reflected not a failure of training, discipline, or oversight, but a deliberate policy choice."
There is surprisingly little in the press release about how the actual act of terrorism is a gross violation of human rights. One sentence in the press release noted in passing that "fighting terrorism is central to the human rights cause." Roth's introduction provides a few more details, but then immediately returns to criticism of the West: "Fighting terrorism is central to the human rights cause. Any deliberate attack on civilians is an affront to fundamental values of the human rights movement. And acts of terrorism took an appalling toll in 2005. In Iraq attacks on civilians occurred nearly every day, killing thousands, while other terror attacks claimed the lives of civilians in Afghanistan, Britain, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Israel, Jordan, Nepal, Pakistan, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. But the willingness to flout human rights to fight terrorism is not only illegal and wrong; it is counterproductive. These human rights violations generate indignation and outrage that spur terrorist recruitment, undermine the public cooperation with law-enforcement officials that is essential to exposing secret terrorist cells, and cede the moral high ground for those combating the terrorist scourge."
What is so disappointing to me is that Human Rights Watch admits that "thousands" are being killed by terrorism in over a dozen countries, and yet the overwhelming focus of the press release and Roth's introduction is on interrogation techniques of the United States. Buried in the report is news that two million are displaced in Sudan, and that in that country "killings, rape, torture, looting of civilian livestock and other property took place on a regular basis." Page after page of the annual report discusses the "pervasive" human rights violations of Saudi Arabia, "routine" torture in Iran and Egypt, "serious human rights problems" in Venezuela relating to police violence, torture, and abusive prison conditions, and serious problems with "torture and ill-treatment" in Mexico. The report notes that Russia "slipped deeper into authoritarianism," while China, "remains a one-party state that does not hold national elections, has no independent judiciary, leads the world in executions, aggressively censors the Internet, bans independent trade unions, and represses minorities such as Tibetans, Uighurs, and Mongolians."
Given the state of human rights around the globe, why is it that Human Rights Watch is so laser focused on the United States? If the annual report is intended to catalogue and highlight the globe's human rights problems, shouldn't the introduction and press release be faithful to that catalogue? I know (and share) the traditional argument that the United States and Europe must be held to a higher standard. But does that justify a global human rights organization, whose motto is "defending human rights worldwide," singling out this country for its harshest criticism? Of all the human rights abuses in the world--the extrajudicial killings, the routine tortures, the grave police violence, the former assassins in political power in Iran bent on the nuclear annihilation of Israel, the genocide in Darfur--what deserves the world's greatest attention are events such as the Bush Administration's opposition to the McCain Amendment? Would Transparency International or Freedom House engage in such overtly political reporting in their annual reports? Of course, I'm not excusing the human rights abuses of any country. But I just find it curious. And disappointing.

4 Comments:

Blogger Charles Gittings said...

"There is surprisingly little in the press release about how the actual act of terrorism is a gross violation of human rights."

There is unsurprisingly absolutely nothing about ordinary armed robbery, murder, or public corruption of the sort practiced by Mr. Abramof et al either.

All the terrorist in the world are not as dangerous as a US administration with absolutely no respect for the law. The moderation of their abuses in no way diminishes the fundamental corruption of their program: they are subverting the Consitituion and the LAW.

1/19/2006 9:20 PM  
Blogger nike said...

ghd hair straighteners mk4
hair straightners
ghd iv styler hair straightener
ghd hair straightners
cheap ghd hair straighteners

Clothing has always been a thing that has been given a great importance by human beings. It displays the attitude that the people exhibit.
ed hardy clothes
ed hardy shirts
Lots of brands have been existent in the clothing industry and a famous one among them is the Ed hardy clothing brand.
ed hardy jackets
ed hardy hoodies
The brand got its name from the famous American tattoo artist Ed Hardy. He was a very famous tattoo artist and has published many books on tattooing techniques.
ed hardy boots
ed hardy polo shirts
But his tattooing turned into a brand by the efforts of a company called Christian Audiger. This company was a very famous and very powerful company in the field of clothing.
ed hardy shoes
ed hardy jeans
They felt that it would be appropriate to create a brand called Ed hardy and use Hardy's art as the main selling point for the brand. This venture had turned out to be a very successful one and Ed hardy clothing is one of the most famous brands in the clothing industry.
ed hardy outerwear
ed hardy long sleeve shirts
The brand became very famous because it was worn by many famous celebrities like Madonna, Britney spears and also Sylvester Stallone.
ed hardy bags
ed hardy uggr boots
The brand has clothes for men, women, and kids. They have also diversified their business by having a lot of accessories to support their clothing business.
ed hardy love kills slowly shirts
ed hardy love kills slowly shoes
ed hardy love kills slowly boots
for men they have a variety of products such as active wear, denim, outwear, swim trucks, sweaters, t-shirts, tops etc.
ed hardy trousers
ed hardy mens
the accessories include things such as belts, caps, scarves, shoes, socks, jeweler, sunglasses, ties and even wallets.
The art works is a unique combination of American and Japanese cultures. The unique selling proposition of the brand is the way in which the company has used the art works of Ed hardy.
ed hardy womens
ed hardy t shirts
ed hardy sunglasses

12/15/2009 8:04 PM  
Blogger nike said...

Nice work and thanks!
Running
Adidas currently manufactures several running shoesNike shoes, including the adiStar Control 5, the adiStar Ride
Cheap nike shoes
Discount nike shoes
the Supernova Sequence and the Supernova Cushion 7, among others.
Nike shox r4
nike shox torch
nike shox shoes
Adidas also uses kangaroo leather to make their more expensive shoes.
Association football
One of the main focuses of Adidas is football kit and associated equipment.
puma cat
cheap sport shoes
Adidas also provides apparel and equipment for all teams in Major League Soccer. Adidas remain a major company in the supply of team kits for international football teams.
cheap nike shox
cheap nike max
Adidas also makes referee kits that are used in international competition and by many countries and leagues in the world. In the United States, referees wear the Adidas kits in MLS matches even though the primary referee supplier is Official Sports.
nike tn dollar
nike running shoes
The company has been an innovator in the area of footwear for the sport with notable examples including development of the Copa Mondial moulded boot on firm dry pitches for forty years.
nike air max tn
puma shoes
Adidas became renowned for advancing the "Predator" boot design.This design featured a ribbed rubber structure for the upper leather of the shoe, used to accent the movement of the ball.
discount puma shoes
puma mens shoes
The Predator also features the Craig Johnston invented "Traxion" sole. As the development and popularity of Football continued Adidas played a leading role in shaping the style of the play itself.
puma running shoes
puma shoes
FIFA, the sports governing body, commissioned specially designed footballs for use in its own World Cup tournaments to favour more attacking play.

12/15/2009 8:05 PM  
Blogger 李小 said...

Right here, your D3 Itemsmemo digs upwards a lot of intention background that will props up the confined opportunity associated with FISA. Not one can be definitive, however, some does trace which NSA wiretapping regarding worldwide marketing and sales communicationsBuy Runescape Gold regarding People in america wasn't in the statute's achieve.

12/24/2012 2:17 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home